It has been described as among the biggest scams of its type in the UK.
Altogether 14 defendants have been sentenced for their part in a multi-million pound plot to swindle over 3,500 holiday ownership holders.
The targets were eager to get out of age-old timeshare contracts and sought out support.
The majority were from 60 and 80. More than 500 of them lost more than £10,000, and a single victim handed over in excess of £80,000.
Those victimized were faced high-pressure sales meetings extending for six hours. They were out of money, holding worthless fake "credits" and still trapped in high-priced vacation property deals they often use.
The firm at the centre of the fraud was the organization in question. They took clients' cash to finance the directors' luxurious lifestyle of private schools, millionaire mansions and personal aircraft.
The leader at the helm of the company, the main defendant, was sentenced to a seven and a half year jail time in January for fraudulent conspiracy.
On Friday, his wife one of the co-defendants was part of the concluding cases to receive sentencing.
She received a 24-month deferred imprisonment at the London court after pleading guilty to money laundering.
This has been a extended wait and marks a major victory for the victims who came forward, the authorities and legal representatives.
The first knowledge of the company was in the mid-2016. The role involved in the research department of a media outlet, creating investigative shows.
A colleague pointed out that his mum had inherited the rights of a timeshare apartment in the Spanish coast and, after long-term use, had begun looking to get out of the agreement.
It's worth mentioning how common vacation properties had grown with English tourists in the last decades of the 20th century.
Timeshares enabled individuals to use the same accommodation annually, or trade their weeks with fellow investors who had units in alternative destinations. About 600,000 vacation seekers took up that chance.
The first timeshare rush was linked to a numerous accounts about rip-off merchants mis-selling units. They became a staple on public interest broadcasts.
The common vacation property deal locked buyers for many years.
By 2016, those investors who had experienced their guaranteed place in the resort for 20 or 30 years were advancing in years, and a significant number were hoping to end their association to their timeshares.
Several had reduced ability to travel and were unable to visit their apartments. Some just felt they'd enjoyed sufficient use from them. And some had died, in frequent situations bequeathing their family members to take over the deals - along with their yearly fees and upkeep costs.
This was the situation the relative had been placed. She looked online for answers and discovered SMT, a enterprise whose online presence claimed to get her out of her deal.
Yet, having made a payment and scheduled a consultation with them, her relatives smelled a rat.
Further research showed many victims claiming they had submitted funds and received no benefit from the service. Indeed, they had lost money. Substantial amounts.
The reporting group started looking into what was occurring. It quickly became clear that there were some shady characters working within the timeshare resale sector.
A legal professional had many grievance cases aiming to litigate against the company.
We spoke to clients who had engaged the company and they each reported similar experiences. They assumed the company would acquire their investment off them but when they participated in a session (for which they made an advance payment) they were told there was no market for their property.
Instead, they were pushed - actually compelled - to invest additional funds purchasing "the company's points system", associated with the organization's holding firm, the overarching entity.
The precise definition was somewhat vague. They seemed similar to a form of credit, offering cheaper vacations and benefits and retail offers.
And they were reportedly "transferable with additional holders, eventually.
Paying cash immediately would lead to an future return that would cover SMT's fees and leave the investor with a gain, liberated eventually from their troublesome contract.
Too good to be true? Indeed, it was.
If these accounts were correct, this was a large-scale fraud.
The technique is termed a "bait-and-switch."
Someone - here the organization - "lures the customer by marketing a particular product but then to claim it is unavailable, directing the client towards another, inferior offering.
Such practices are unlawful. Equipped with all the accounts we had gathered, we presented the rationale to covertly record one of the organization's sessions.
The process requires time, effort, and clear arguments for why this is the exclusive approach to gather the evidence required to confirm deceptive practices.
Armed with that permission, our compact group arranged a meeting with one of the organization's staff in the English town.
Posing as a ordinary individual hoping to help his mother free from her timeshare contract|holiday ownership agreement
A former casino floor manager turned slot analyst, Mikael shares data-driven insights to help players make smarter betting decisions.